The Presence

The Presence

The Presence, directed by Steven Soderbergh, is a hauntingly inventive take on the ghost story genre, distinguished by its narrative arc and a jaw-dropping plot twist that redefines the film’s emotional core. Shot entirely from the perspective of an unseen supernatural entity, the movie unfolds as a slow-burn family drama laced with spectral intrigue, culminating in a revelation that transforms its seemingly straightforward premise into a poignant meditation on grief, guilt, and redemption.

The story arc begins with the Payne family—Rebecca (Lucy Liu), Chris (Chris Sullivan), and their teenage children, Tyler (Eddy Maday) and Chloe (Callina Liang)—moving into a beautifully renovated suburban home. The camera, embodying the titular presence, drifts through the house, observing the family’s fractured dynamics. Chloe, grieving the loss of her friend Nadia to an overdose, senses the entity’s watchful gaze, while her self-absorbed mother and cruel brother dismiss her unease. The arc builds tension through subtle supernatural hints—books float, shelves crash—interwoven with the family’s unraveling relationships. Chloe’s isolation deepens as she secretly dates Ryan (West Mulholland), Tyler’s manipulative friend, and the presence grows protective, knocking over a drugged drink Ryan prepares for her. This escalation hints at a classic haunting, but Soderbergh keeps the focus on emotional undercurrents rather than cheap scares, setting the stage for the twist.

The plot twist arrives in the film’s final act, shattering assumptions about the presence’s identity. As Ryan’s sinister nature surfaces—he confesses to killing Nadia and drugs Chloe again—the entity frantically intervenes, rousing a sedated Tyler. In a shocking climax, Tyler tackles Ryan out a window, killing them both to save his sister. The denouement reveals the presence as Tyler himself, trapped in a paradoxical loop where his death enables his redemptive act. This twist reframes the entire arc: the entity’s fixation on Chloe wasn’t Nadia’s ghost but Tyler’s future self, seeking atonement for his past cruelty. The final image—Rebecca glimpsing Tyler in a mirror—seals the story with gut-wrenching sorrow.

This narrative pivot elevates The Presence beyond a gimmicky POV experiment into a profound exploration of familial bonds and personal evolution. The arc’s slow build, though occasionally frustrating, pays off by making the twist both surprising and inevitable. It’s not a horror film in the traditional sense—lacking jump scares—but its eerie atmosphere and emotional depth linger. Soderbergh’s masterful camerawork and the cast’s raw performances amplify the story’s impact, though the ambiguity of the presence’s timeline might leave some viewers puzzled. Still, the twist’s resonance, blending tragedy with a flicker of grace, makes The Presence a standout, proving that the most haunting ghosts are the ones we carry within.

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Greenlights

Greenlights

As I listened to Greenlights by Matthew McConaughey, I wasn’t sure what to expect—maybe a Hollywood tell-all or a breezy celebrity memoir. Instead, I found myself on a wild, introspective ride, uncovering layers of wisdom, humour, and raw humanity that unfolded with every page. It’s less a linear story and more a treasure chest of life lessons, delivered in McConaughey‘s unmistakable voice, dripping with Texas charm and a poet’s soul.

Early on, I was struck by his theme of ”greenlights”—those moments when life says go. He doesn‘t just recount successes; he digs into the messy, unglamorous struggles that shaped him, like losing his father or wrestling with fame. I started seeing my own greenlights—times I’d stumbled into opportunity without realising it. His knack for turning chaos into meaning hooked me. One minute, he’s a kid getting spanked for saying ”hate”, the next he’s crafting bumper-sticker philosophies like ”Less impressed, more involved.” I scribbled that one down.

"The sooner we become less impressed with our life, our accomplishments, our career, our relationships, the sooner we can get on with the business of living."

Then came the self-discovery. McConaughey’s journals—spanning decades—reveal a man obsessed with understanding himself. His wet-dream-turned-arrest story had me laughing, but his retreat to a monastery to ’catch a greenlight” made me pause. I began reflecting on my own need for stillness. He doesn’t preach; he invites you to wrestle with your own choices. By the time he’s floating down the Amazon or ditching rom-coms for riskier roles, I’m rooting for his reinvention—and wondering where I’ve played it too safe.

The book’s heartbeat is freedom through responsibility. He frames family, love, and even grief as anchors, not chains. His ode to his wife, Camilla, hit me hard—less Hollywood gloss, more gritty partnership. I found myself rethinking how I show up for people. And his ”red lights”—failures turned lessons—taught me to stop fearing the no in life. He’s not flawless; he owns his contradictions, like chasing dreams while staying grounded.

"Life is not a question, it’s not a problem to be solved, it’s a story to be told."

By the end, Greenlights felt like a conversation with a friend who’s lived hard and learned harder. It’s messy, messy, profound, and oddly practical—part roadmap, part campfire tale. I closed it feeling lighter, scribbling my own Greenlights, ready to spot the next one. McConaughey doesn’t just share his life; he hands you a lens to see yours. Alright, alright, alright—I’m sold.

Greenlights
Greenlights by Matthew McConaughey. On sale now

Freedom vs Connetions: What Truly Matters

Freedom vs Connetions: What Truly Matters

Freedom is often held up as the ultimate prize, the shimmering “holy grail” that unlocks a good life. It’s easy to see why – freedom gives you the ability to choose your path, to speak your mind, to chase what sets your soul on fire. Without it, you’re a puppet on someone else’s strings, and that’s a suffocating thought. History backs this up: people have fought, bled, and died for liberty, from the American Revolution to the fall of the Berlin Wall. It’s a primal drive, rooted in our need for autonomy.

But is it *everything*? Strip away the rhetoric, and freedom alone can ring hollow. A guy stranded on a desert island has all the freedom in the world – no laws, no boss, no authority telling him where to park his imaginary car. Yet he’s miserable, starving, and talking to coconuts. Freedom’s only as good as what you can do with it, and that hinges on something deeper: connection. Humans are wired for it. Study after study – like the Harvard Grant Study, tracking lives for 80 years – shows that relationships, not independence, are the backbone of happiness and meaning. People on their deathbeds don’t regret not having more solo time; they regret not loving harder or mending broken ties.

low angle photo of flock of flying birds
Photo by Liam Naidoo / Unsplash
"Freedom’s only as good as what you can do with it, and that hinges on something deeper: connection."

Take freedom to an extreme, and it can even backfire. Total liberty without purpose or community breeds chaos – think Lord of the Flies, not utopia. Meanwhile, someone in a restrictive society, like a parent in a warzone, might find more life in a single act of protecting their kid than a freewheeling bachelor finds in a decade of “living his truth.” Purpose and love trump raw autonomy every time.

So, what’s really more important than freedom? I’d argue it’s meaning – forged through relationships, purpose, and something bigger than yourself. Freedom’s a tool, a hell of a good one, but it’s not the endgame. You can be free as a bird and still feel caged if you’re alone, aimless, or disconnected. The holy grail isn’t just breaking the chains – it’s knowing who or what you’d run to once they’re off.

GPD Pocket 4

GPD Pocket 4

GPD Pocket 4 is undoubtedly one the best UMPCs out there.

Hot Take

It’s sleek, fits in your backpack like a paperback book, and zips through tasks like emails, spreadsheets, or coding. Need to work on a cramped train seat? It’s your MVP. But try hauling lumber with a sports car, and you’ll wish you had a pickup truck. Same here: if you’re editing 4K videos or gaming, this thing will wheeze like a treadmill at max speed.

When to Buy It

  • You’re Always On the Move: Picture a digital nomad typing blog posts in a Tokyo cafĂŠ or a nurse jotting notes between rounds. It’s like having a full Windows laptop that moonlights as a tablet.
  • You Hate Bulk: If your current laptop feels like carrying a brick, this is the antidote. Slips into a small bag, no backaches.
  • You’re a Tinkerer: Love gadgets that feel like secret tech? This is the “James Bond gadget” of laptops—niche but cool.

When to Skip It

  • Your Eyes Hate Tiny Text: Using this for Netflix? The screen’s like watching a movie through a mail slot. Grab a tablet instead.
  • You’re a Keyboard Warrior: Typing on this is like texting on a flip phone—if you’ve got big hands, prepare for typos and rage.
  • Budget Matters: Dropping $1k+ on this is like buying a designer wallet. Sure, it’s fancy, but a regular wallet (or laptop) holds more stuff for half the price.

Alternatives to Consider

  • Need Cheap & Chill? A used MacBook Air or Chromebook. Bigger screen, less “oof” on your wallet.
  • Just Want Netflix? An iPad + keyboard. Way better for couch-binging.
  • Power User? A gaming laptop or MacBook Pro. Think of them as the SUVs of tech—bulky but unstoppable.

Final Take

The Pocket 4 is like a luxury espresso shot—small, intense, and perfect for a quick boost. But if you need a whole latte (or a budget-friendly drip coffee), look elsewhere. Buy it only if you’re obsessed with portability and okay with trade-offs. Otherwise, your money’s happier elsewhere. 😊

Check it out here: https://gpd.hk/gpdpocket4

The Hidden Thermodynamics of Human Connection

The Hidden Thermodynamics of Human Connection

Introduction: The Rhythm of Survival

In a sunlit courtyard, a dozen women pound grain in unison, their pestles striking stone in perfect rhythm. To the casual observer, this synchronization is mere practicality—efficiency in labor. But beneath the surface lies a profound biological truth: their aligned movements are not just about speed, but survival. Recent research reveals that humans unconsciously synchronize physical rhythms—breathing, blinking, even speech—to reduce the metabolic cost of social interaction. This phenomenon rewrites our understanding of why we sync, shifting the narrative from social bonding to caloric conservation.

The Science of Cognitive Thrift

The human brain, though only 2% of body mass, consumes 20% of its energy. A significant portion fuels the prefrontal cortex, the region responsible for predicting others’ intentions—a critical skill in social species. However, predicting behavior is metabolically expensive. Studies using fMRI and metabolic tracking show that when individuals synchronize movements, the prefrontal cortex reduces its energy consumption by up to 18%. This "neural standby mode" occurs because synchronized rhythms allow the brain to offload prediction work to the body’s automatic systems. Like a computer switching to low-power mode, the mind conserves calories by relying on rhythmic alignment as a shortcut.

Cultural Rituals as Thermodynamic Artifacts

From Indigenous drum circles to military marches, synchronized rituals pervade every culture. Anthropologists have long attributed these practices to social cohesion, but the metabolic lens offers a new perspective. Consider the haka of the Māori, where precise, collective movements not only intimidate foes but also reduce cognitive load. Similarly, Buddhist chanters or rowers in a Viking longboat leverage rhythm to bypass the brain’s energy tax. These rituals are not merely cultural glue; they are evolved efficiency strategies. By outsourcing prediction to shared rhythms, groups minimize individual metabolic costs, enabling prolonged collaboration—a survival advantage for early humans facing resource scarcity.

Implications: Redefining Social Behavior

This insight challenges the axiom that synchronization is inherently social. Instead, it positions syncing as an evolutionary adaptation to offset the brain’s voracious energy demands. Social bonding may be a byproduct, not the goal. This reframes behaviors like mirroring a colleague’s posture during a negotiation or swaying in unison at a concert: they are not just acts of empathy but biological imperatives to conserve energy. Even infants, who instinctively synchronize movements with caregivers, may be engaging in proto-metabolic optimization.

Counterarguments and Balance

Critics argue that social bonding remains central, citing oxytocin release during synchronized activities. Yet oxytocin itself may function as part of the energy-saving mechanism, reducing stress (and thus metabolic strain). The two explanations are not mutually exclusive—evolution often repurposes existing systems. However, the metabolic hypothesis provides a foundational why: bonding mechanisms likely evolved atop a primal need to manage energy budgets.

Future Frontiers

Understanding synchronization as a metabolic hack opens new research avenues. Could workplaces boost productivity by designing tasks that encourage rhythmic alignment? Might therapies for social anxiety incorporate synchronization to reduce cognitive load? Even AI design could benefit, as engineers mimic this biological efficiency in human-machine interfaces.

Conclusion: The Body’s Silent Calculus

Syncing is not about harmony for harmony’s sake. It is the body’s silent calculus, a negotiation between survival and sociality. Every matched step, every shared chant, whispers of an ancient truth: to connect, we must first conserve. In this dance of energy and evolution, humans are not just social creatures—we are thermodynamic ones.

The Creative Act: A Way of Being

The Creative Act: A Way of Being

When I picked up The Creative Act by Rick Rubin, what unfolded was less a how-to manual and more a meditative journey into creativity's soul, revealling insights that shifted how I see art and life.

The idea that creativity isn't a rate gift but a universal pulse we all tap into. He frames it as a force–almost mystical–flowing though us, not from us. This hit hard: I'd always thought I needed to make something brilliant. Instead, Rubin suggests we're conduits, tuning in like radios. It's freeing, though humbling–my ego took a backseat as I started seeing ideas as visitors, not possessions.

"If something strikes me as interesting or beautiful, first I live that experience. Only afterward might I attempt to understand it."

His take on process over product sank in. He nudges you to ditch perfectionism and embrace the mess–creation thrives in play, not pressure. I found myself scribbling notes, inspired to doodle or strum my guitar without a goal. Rubin's stories from the studio, subtle yet vivid, back this up: genius emerges when you let go. It's counterintuitive but rings true–I stopped judging my half-backed ideas and just let them breathe.

To live as an artist is a way of being in the world. A way of perceiving. A practice of paying attention. Refining our sensitivity to tune in to the more subtle notes. Looking for what draws us in and what pushes us away. Noticing what feeling tones arise and where they lead. Attuned choice by attuned choice, your entire life is a form of self-expression. You exist as a creative being in a creative universe. A singular work of art.

Another gem was his riff on contraints. I'd always seem limits as creativity's enermy–time, tools, rules. Rubin flips that: boundaries spark ingenuity. He recalls artists who turned flaws into signatures, and I started rethinking my own frustrations. A deadline? A frame. No budget? A challenge. It's practical wisdom, nudging me to work with what's in front of me.

Then there's the quiet power of awareness. Rubin urges you to notice–really notice–the world. Sounds, colors, fleeting thoughts. it's less about forcing inspiration and more about staying open. I caught myself pausing mid-walk to hear the wind, feeling oddly connected to some bigger creative current. It's simple, but it stuck.

"Let’s make art, and let others make the stories."

By the end, The Creative Act felt like a conversation with a wise friend–one who doesn't preach but prods you to discover. Rubin doesn't hand you a map; he lights a spark. I'm left rethinking how I approach not just art but decisions, risks, even failures. It's not a book you finish–it's one you carry, letting its insights unfold as you create.

Lost in the Ghostly Woods

Lost in the Ghostly Woods

Okay, deep breaths. It's late, and the glow of my laptop screen is starting to feel like it's burning into my retinas, but I have to figure this out. The Ghost template debacle. It’s a first-world problem, I know, but it’s a problem nonetheless.

I've spent the past few days, maybe even a week, diving into the world of Ghost themes. I want something clean, minimal, and something that really let my content organized in its own customized sections. I've narrowed it down to four, which, ironically, has made the decision even harder. They each have their own allure, their own little quirks that are driving me slightly mad.

First, there's Kyoto. It's so… refined. The minimalist aesthetic is exactly what I envisioned, and the typography is stunning. It feels like a high-end magazine. But, is it too minimalist? I worry it might lack personality, that it could feel a little sterile over time.

Then there's Braun. It's got that lovely, modern, almost tech-y feel. The grid layout is dynamic, and the image handling is superb. It feels very current, very "now." But, I’m unsure if the strong visual elements will distract from the text, which is, ultimately, the most important thing.

Next up, OnFlow. It's the most vibrant of the bunch. The subtle animations and the way it handles featured images are really captivating. It feels alive. But, is it too much? Will the animations become annoying after a while? Is it too “trendy” and will it age poorly?

And finally, Format. It's the classic, clean, and straightforward option. It feels like a safe bet. It’s designed for readability and clarity, which is great. But, is it too safe? Will I end up feeling like I’m using a generic template?

Each time I think I've made a decision, I find myself second-guessing it. I keep switching back and forth between the demos, scrutinizing every pixel, every font choice. I'm driving myself crazy.

  • Kyoto: Elegant, but potentially too austere.
  • Braun: Modern, but maybe too visually dominant.
  • OnFlow: Dynamic, but possibly too flashy.
  • Format: Reliable, but perhaps too bland.

I need to think about my long-term goals. What kind of content will I be creating? Who is my audience? Which theme will best serve those needs?

Maybe I need to step away from the screen for a while. A walk, some tea, a good night's sleep. Maybe then, I’ll be able to see things with a clearer perspective.

For now, though, I'm just going to stare at the screen a bit longer, hoping for some kind of divine inspiration. Or maybe just a strong cup of coffee.

Oh, hello

Oh, hello

The site is up and running — this little corner is my quiet space on the internet where I will be actively posting on a regular basis about things of my interest and passion; small but important thoughts, half-baked ideas, quotes from books and articles, and links to fascinating things I find and read on the internet. From time to time, I will write reviews, short essays and monologues on my reflection, introspection and personal growth.

Here’s to another new humble beginning at adiax.io. This will be my main portfolio website where I will be actively posting life and project updates. More to come — stay tuned!

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to adiax.io.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.